Screens
Real workflows, UI-first.
These are product-grade screen mocks designed to look and behave like a real enterprise console. Each screen is mapped to a decision outcome and backed by traceable inputs (sources, time window, coverage, and computation notes).
Map-first exploration
Driver decomposition
Risk register & owners
Scenario compare
Evidence pack export
Screen tour
Auto-play
Exposure
₹ 7,820 Cr
+11% vs baseline
High-risk assets
128
Flood
61
Heat
44
Confidence
0.86
Coverage: 94% regions
Top drivers
Rainfall anomaly32%
Drainage capacity24%
Slope / terrain19%
Decision brief
Priority: Fund top 10 interventions that reduce flood depth near critical assets.
Why: Risk moved +11% driven by rainfall anomaly and drainage constraint.
Evidence: sources + window + coverage + computation notes attached.
Why: Risk moved +11% driven by rainfall anomaly and drainage constraint.
Evidence: sources + window + coverage + computation notes attached.
PDF pack
CSV register
Annexure
AOI
Factory Campus
Window
Rolling 30d
Top driver
Flood depth
Asset
Hazard
Risk
Owner / Next
Plant Intake — Sector 14
Drivers: flood depth · drainage · proximity to river
High
Ops
Mitigate
Worker Housing — Block C
Drivers: heat stress · wet-bulb · power reliability
Medium
Safety
Plan
Substation — Corridor B
Drivers: fire proximity · vegetation dryness · wind
Medium
Utilities
Monitor
What makes it audit-ready
- Every row links to sources, time window and computation.
- Driver decomposition explains “why the score is high”.
- Owners + deadlines make it operational (not just a map).
Export package
PDF summary + CSV register + annexure with sources & coverage.
CSRD-ready
SB 261-ready
WBGT
31.2°C
Threshold crossed
Safe work
35 min / hr
Based on workload
Suggested actions
Hydration · Shade · Reschedule
Evidence attached
Hourly risk curve
Output is defensible: WBGT is computed from sourced temperature, humidity, wind and radiation proxies (documented in annexure).
Loss delta
+18%
Driver: rainfall extremes
New hotspots
+26
High severity additions
Mitigation impact
-9%
If top 10 actions funded
Narrative summary
Under 2050 conditions, rainfall intensity increases and drainage constraints produce larger flood depths in the river belt.
GEORdr highlights newly exposed assets, quantifies expected loss, and ranks the top mitigations by ROI.
Decision: upgrade drainage in top 6 zones; protect 2 critical facilities.
Evidence: scenario layer + asset overlay + computation + confidence.
Executive summary
Exposure increased in river-adjacent regions due to rainfall anomalies and drainage constraints.
Recommended actions: 18 hotspots prioritized, confidence 0.82–0.88, with traceable sources.
Hazard
Flood + Heat
Scope
Asset-level
Evidence
12 sources
Provenance checklist
Source registry attached✓
Coverage & quality✓
Driver breakdown✓
Decision log✓
Export artifacts
Leadership PDF (maps + drivers + actions)
CSV risk register (assets, risk, owners)
Annexure (sources + coverage + methods)
Designed to survive scrutiny: every value can be traced and re-computed.
Want screens tailored to your industry?
Email your asset types (plants, warehouses, hospitals, pipelines), geography, and top hazards. We will respond with a demo path and sample outputs.